Best Of

For anyone else experiencing the same issue- it seems that as per the tech guys advise, running 3x rebuilds fixes this issue... i have just gone through this process and YTD payroll/tax figures are now showing on employee centre and payslips..... how bizaare!

This process fixes most glitches, glad you’re sorted

@Accounts Department Did you terminate the employee in RAH (including adding a Termination Date)? Were there any ETP-related amounts? If so, the Termination Date is required for these specific labels to generate.

Unfortunately, the ATO do not understand the finalisation process variations across all the different software solutions & their “it’s the software” response is the standard fallback. Unlike many of the other programs - & as per Kris’s advice - RAH still contains accessibility to the Payment Summaries feature - Currently, this is the only way to determine exactly what figures are reporting at which specific STP labels. Used in conjunction with a modified Payroll Summary - (The Payroll Totals report can sometimes be a bit out so I always use the Payroll Summary) - showing columns by Employee - will confirm YTD totals (the Payroll Summary) AND where they are actually reporting in STP (Payment Summaries)

The GL is not specifically linked to STP - How it reports in STP is determined by the setup of the Payroll Items. (Obviously all of these areas should be the same but the only way to clarify STP figures is as explained above)

Not sure where you found that info 🤔

As far as I’m aware the employment basis is irrelevant to the process for flow-through of the TFN Dec via STP. Obviously you would want to ensure you have setup the employee accordingly - including the correct tax label (eg TFT etc) & employment status, just as the employee would tick the correct boxes on the previous paper version - but I’ve submitted TFN Decs for casuals & PT-ers this way without any issue.

Yes but I still like to check the figures in the payment summaries as a further verification and still give them out if requested. It’s a good way to check allowances and RESC

Good luck sorry I have nothing else to say. Would you consider submitting the EOFY again?

I understand, but have to ask the question to be able to try and help. People’s ideas of reconciling things differ, and just as you don’t know my processes I don’t know yours - possibly exactly the same. Yes I use STP for many people for many years.

I understand that the file was reported incorrectly hence my question about lodging it again.

have nothing else to suggest sorry